NY Congressman   Condemns FDA Ruling on
Medical Marijuana
by Jeff Lieberson for Maurice Hinchey (D-NY)   
(27 Apr, 2006)
Hinchey leads   bipartisan House
coalition in calling for FDA to explain baseless   
anti-medical marijuana policy
Washington, DC -- One week after the Food   and Drug Administration
(FDA) issued a baseless, one page press release   claiming that marijuana
had no medical benefits,

Congressman Maurice Hinchey   (D-NY) led a bipartisan group of 24
House members in calling on the agency to   explain its reasoning and
show scientific proof to support its view.

Hinchey, who has offered an amendment in the House three times that
would bar   the federal government from prosecuting medical marijuana
patients, doctors,   and suppliers in states where medical marijuana is
legal, and his colleagues   said the FDAÂ’s action appears to be politically
motivated and defies the   results of a White House-commissioned
Institute of Medicine (IOM) study from   1999 that detailed the benefits of
medical marijuana use.
WAIT !
THERE"S
MORE !!

LISTEN TO
THIS

Check bottom of page
Congressman Maurice     Hinchey (D-NY)

“Despite the fact that you are responding to a scientific question, your   press release failed to provide any scientific
expertise. We call on you to   show us the purported scientific evidence for the basis of this response.   There is no evidence
that you have new scientific proof or that you oversaw   clinical trials,” Hinchey and his colleagues wrote in a letter sent today
to   FDA Acting Commissioner Andrew von Eschenbach. “It perplexes us that even   though the FDA is responsible for
protecting public health, the agency has   failed to respond adequately to the IOMÂ’s findings seven years after the   studyÂ’s
publication date.”

On April 20, the FDA issued a one-page press release without any   documentation to back up its claim that, “...No sound
scientific studies   supported medical use of marijuana for treatment in the United States, and no   animal or human data
supported the safety or efficacy of marijuana for   general medical use.” This statement fails to take into account the IOM   
report from 1999, which found that marijuanaÂ’s active components are   potentially effective in treating pain, nausea, the
anorexia of AIDS wasting,   and other symptoms, and should be tested rigorously in clinical trials.

“We saw it with the agencyÂ’s decision on the emergency contraceptive, Plan B,   and weÂ’re seeing it again with medical
marijuana: the FDA is making decisions   based on politics instead of science,” Hinchey said. “The FDA should not be a   
political entity. Rather, the agency should be in the business of ensuring   all Americans have access to safe and effective
drugs, including medical   marijuana.”

Hinchey and his colleagues noted in their letter to von Eschenbach that the FDA   has an Investigational New Drug (IND)
Compassionate Access Program, which   allowed some Americans with certain medical conditions to apply to the agency   
to receive marijuana from the federal government. Seven people are currently   still in the program and routinely receive
marijuana from the federal   government. The House members suggest that the IND is an example of how the   FDA could
allow for the legal use of marijuana without having to go through   the series of steps many other drugs go through before
getting approved.
WAIT ! THERE"S MORE !!

LISTEN TO THIS

(
may require plug in)
Real Audio
Mother Nature
Doesn't Make
Mistakes
Media Player
Quick Time
Dr. Julian Whitaker talks about what he believes are abuses by pharmaceutical companies and
the FDA, as well as alternative treatments for life threatening illnesses.
Capsuless - Nut -Protein - Flour - Coffee
HEMP